Long Runtime

Brian Stauffer reported for Variety on something I’ve surely noticed a lot lately: movies are really freaking long now. So many movies clock in at two and a half or even nearly three hours, lately. For me, it seems to be a detrimental factor each and every time I think about watching a film. Even when watching at home, the long runtime means you can’t just pop a movie on after dinner, especially when you need to be up for work the next day.

Stauffer talks to a number of industry people about this and how all that extra footage has a financial impact on a film’s budget too.

With a visual-effects-driven film, an extra 30 to 60 more minutes of screen time can increase a budget by as much as 25%, one source at a major studio estimates. The more footage on tape, the more time is needed in post-production stages, which adds some $50,000 to $100,000 per week, the insider adds. That takes into account aspects like audio mixing and sound editing.


One interesting other tidbit was a clause that directors sign when agreeing to come on board. Apparently, they must agree to deliver a film that is no longer than two hours. But it seems the rule is widely ignored by studios for fear of interfering with the creative process. There’s a lot more to the entire trend and it doesn’t point at only one thing. Stauffer’s reporting is a fascinating take on why this is happening.

This has been another article for curious readers like you.

TimeMachiner helps you find that next great article, like this one, by sharing the best in tech, culture, and nostalgia.

Subscribe below. It fits great in your inbox.